G8: Jamboree of Clowns

The G8 is in town and they're partying hard in Northern Ireland. The G8 is of course made up of world leaders from the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Germany, Russia, China, Japan and Canada. The G8 to me is just an annual reminder that all these countries have the same agenda on most things and that the rivalries perpetuated between these countries (such as the US and China) amount to nothing other than a show for the media and global audience to keep people divided and confused.

Ideologically all these world leaders are the same, they're all capitalist neoliberals who sway left and right to appease the naysayers when necessary.

However real clashes of interest exist on foreign policy towards non-neoliberal nations, such as Syria who the UK and USA want to bomb to smithereens while Russia and China want to let them solve their own domestic crisis without foreign intervention. Which is in my opinion the most sensible and least dangerous approach to take.

And this was demonstrated when Russian leader Vladimir Putin and David Cameron held a press conference on the issue of Syria. Vladimir Putin stuck to his guns and said without holding back: "I think you will not deny that one does not really need to support the people who not only kill their enemies, but open up their bodies, eat their intestines, in front of the public and cameras. Are these the people you want to support? Is it them who you want to supply with weapons".
  
                                        You can watch that press conference here:

However, it was yesterday when a real and somewhat unnoticed TV moment of hell happened to poor David Cameron who was on air on ITV news talking to Alastair Stewart about the crisis in Syria. Alastair Stewart said to Cameron: "Putin said, some of those people you want to arm are the same kind of people (radical Islamists) who are accused of murdering drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich, that must have stung"

Cameron quickly replies with the same old repeated mantra of Bashar-Al Assad being evil and that the he needs to be disposed from power ect.. Then Alastair Stewart brings up the fact 57% of British public polled are against the arming of Syrian rebels and nor do most of Cameron's own backbenchers in Parliament and then magically David Cameron says "lost comms" (lost communication/audio) promptly bringing an end to a tough interview which Cameron clearly wasn't enjoying. He was clearly faking the communication loss and you can tell that by looking at his body language shortly before he pretends he can't hear anything during the interview. (You'll see what I mean when you see it, watch the video below and share it around.)

Cheers.

LINKS:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10123800/Syria-Putin-warns-West-not-to-arm-rebels-who-eat-the-organs-of-their-enemies.html 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRTse8j070U
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/16/putin-warns-against-arming-syrian-rebels
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article35312.htm

Friends of Barack Obama [warning: includes graphic content]

The crisis in Syria has been the main focus of mainstream media attention for the last few days, due to the Obama administration announcing they would be arming the opposition in Syria because of so called evidence that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons on armed opposition during the first few months of 2013. This of course means Assad has crossed Obama's mighty 'red-line' which means the United States and her allies (UK, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar) are now going to step up support for the opposition, mainly the Free Syrian Army (FSA).

Though the Obama administration hasn't clearly specified what type of weapons will be sent to the opposition in Syria, it is well understood that this support will include shipments of anti-aircraft missile launchers, modern assault rifles and armored vehicles to counter the Syrian Arab Army and potentially the balance of power in this 2 year long civil war.

And although a Libya style no-fly zone has been speculated about it looks unlikely that this will happen as the Obama administration has said recently: "it will be dramatically more difficult and costly to set up a no-fly zone in Syria than Libya and there is no U.S. national interest in pursuing intense, open-ended military engagement via a Syria no-fly zone".

However, all speculation aside let's take a look at the type of people who will be getting these new sophisticated weapon shipments and then ask yourself, how could anything possibly go wrong?

But don't worry, expert on international security David Cameron has said that the "bad guys" will be "driven out" and that only the "good guys" will be getting the weapons. He also downplays the sizable role Islamic militants play in the armed opposition to Assad and if you don't understand the scale of this role then here is something for you.

There is literally only one major city in Syria which Bashar al-Assad does not control and that is Raqqa City in Northern Syria which was seized by opposition forces back in March following an intense 3-day battle between both sides.

Now according to both opposition sources AND regime sources the city has been placed under strict Sharia Law by Islamic militants from the group known as Jabhat al-nusra which is fighting to replace the Assad regime with an Islamic state like 90s era Afghanistan. There have been reports of public executions and mass rapes and almost if not the entire Christian population of Raqqa has fled in fear of being either killed or coverted to Islam.

Flag of al-qaeda over Raqqa Square

And this is just one city under rebel control, imagine the entire country under rebel control for a second, what do you think will happen to Syria's 2,500,000 Christians? (10% of the population). How well do you think they will co-exist with the new Islamist rulers of Syria? Let's face it, Assad isn't perfect in any sense but he offers Syria stability and the people safety from ideologies such as Sharia Law and minorities such as Christians and Druze have prospered during his secular reign of power. Why would you want to fix something which isn't broken or was that Obama's plan from very the begining?

Please watch this new short documentry on the situation in Syria (above) by Nick Griffin who visited Syria recently and witnessed first hand what is actually happening there. And remember, if we can wake enough people up about what is happening then we can change the course of history.

Cheers.

LINKS: 

http://www.freep.com/article/20130614/NEWS15/306140065/Syrian-rebels-pledge-loyalty-to-al-Qaeda
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/06/14/syrian-rebels-accept-help-from-us-pledge-loyalty-to-al-qaida-77010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsuiBn5ki2s
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/15/syria-no-fly-zone-violate-international-law-russia
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2339367/Syrian-boy-Mohammad-14-shot-dead-parents-Islamic-extremists-claimed-insulted-Prophet.html

The Death of White America

Last year it was revealed non-White births outnumbered White births in the US for the first time in history since records began. That statistic alone paints a bleak future for future generations of White Americans who will be living in a very different kind of country America is today and has been since its founding.

But today we learned a new milestone had been reached, it would appear that the rate of White Americans dying is now outnumbering the rate of White babies being born. The main reason for this is that White women simply aren't having enough White children, and those that do only start having kids in their 30s after finishing education or finding a strong career to settle down in life with.

This is the direct result of the rise of feminism and the overhaul of the traditional family (nuclear family), progressive liberals will no doubt cheer at this news because it represents a changing America. The America the USSR could never defeat is collapsing at a faster rate than anyone could of previously expected (without a shot being fired) and this comes just as Russia begins to rejuvenate their economy with a healthy birth rate of Russian citizens and a strong Conservative government to keep liberal progressives (cultural marxists) at bay. Pretty ironic isn't it?

No doubt this news will have long term ramifications for the entire US but this racial decline is only apparent in the White ethnic group, no other racial group (Latino, Black, Asian, Indian) has seen such a similar decline, it would appear this problem is unique to Whites and none others.

 

 
Report:  "Population estimates for 2012 released Thursday show what’s known as a natural decrease — a straightforward calculation of births minus deaths — of about 12,400 people among the nation’s 198 million non-Hispanic whites. Although the percentage is small, several demographers said they are not aware of another time in U.S. history — not even during the Depression or wars — when there was such shrinkage among the dominant racial group. No other group showed a similar falloff.

The decrease was offset by 188,000 white immigrants, most from Canada and Germany but also from Russia and Saudi Arabia. And non-Hispanic whites remain the single largest group, making up 63 percent of the country.

But demographers were surprised by the outsize drop in births compared with deaths, which the Census Bureau projects will begin happening with regularity by 2025."

This ultimately means that from 2025 the White demographic group in America will decline in actual numbers each year, possibly speeding up the process of the United States becoming a majority non-White country which is currently predicted to happen by 2042.

Also notice how these statistics include Saudi Arabian migrants (Arabs) as White, which they clearly aren't so the actual decline rate will be lower than 12.4 percent.

Report:  Census demographers expect the growth rate for non-Hispanic whites to resume rising — slowly — when the economy improves. The number for whites should peak in 2024, when the oldest baby boomers, who are overwhelmingly non-Hispanic whites, are well into their 70s and dying in larger numbers. The decrease for whites has little significance in the short term, said Dowell Myers, a demographer and urban planner who teaches at the University of Southern California.


“In California, we roll our eyes at this,” he said. “Whites have been a minority here since 1999. But whites are still a majority of voters. Babies don’t vote. Older people vote. So it doesn’t have any direct functional meaning.”

But Frey said the natural decrease in whites suggests that aging whites will increasingly come to rely on the younger, mainly minority population to underwrite social programs that will sustain them. “Last year, we saw the majority of babies are minorities,” he said. “Now we see more whites are dying than being born. Together, that tells us a lot about where we’re going as a country.”

He is absolutely correct, it does show where the US is going as a country (spoiler alert: Not in the right direction). The US prospered economically due to European immigration, the US only really began accepting third-world immigrants in the 60s when the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was passed into law by progressive US president Lyndon Johnson (who also signed the civil rights act) and granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.

But he is wrong about Whites 'rolling their eyes" at this whole thing, there is a reason racial tensions are rising across the country, there is a reason White flight is occuring where Whites have become an ethnic minority ect.. The realization of this issue is now setting in and people are waking up to long neglected problems, patriot militia groups on the rise and White Student Unions are popping up across every state and anti-immigration sentiment is growing in White suburban communities.

I'm not even American and even I can tell that storm clouds are gathering. And the scary thing is that British Whites face an almost identical crisis in the UK, if you think about it so do most majority White (European/Caucasian) countries, one could assume an international conspiracy against Whites is at hand here, one wonders about that very strongly indeed... [insert theory here please].

Cheers.

LINKS:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/white-deaths-outnumber-births-for-first-time/2013/06/13/3bb1017c-d388-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html
http://rt.com/usa/us-white-births-census-613/
http://bangordailynews.com/2013/06/13/politics/white-deaths-now-outnumber-births-in-us/
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-06-13/white-share-of-u-dot-s-dot-population-drops-as-deaths-outpace-births

Europe does not owe Israel anything

It is no secret, I do go out of my way to avoid talking about the State of Israel and Jews due to the craziness and sensitivity which comes with the issue but in this case I had no choice. I was browsing the Jerusalem Post earlier today which is a fairly liberal Israeli online newspaper, at least not as right-wing as say Ynet news but this paper would probably be considered right-wing by UK standards. Anyway, I usually browse this paper for news updates on the situation in Syria and the crisis with Iran but an article about Europe caught my eye today, written by Paul Gross and titled 'Europe's Historic Responsibility: Proscribe terror' this article got me quite riled up and angry to the point where I knew I had to blog about it. Please try and leave rational comments, I don't want to see the comment section become something like JewWatch.

Paul Gross makes his case that Europe owes the Jewish people a historic responsibility due to the Holocaust and that responsibility is protecting Jews from radical Islamists and 'far-right extremists' such as the Golden Dawn in Greece or the Jobbik movement in Hungary.

In his own words: "Three cheers for Dutch courage. At present Holland is the only European country that has followed the lead of the US and Canada and designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization."

"Britain has blacklisted its “military wing” but not its “political wing” (implying a distinction which does not actually exist) and has just been rebuffed in its efforts to persuade the European Union to follow its lead."

"Europe often gets short shrift from Israelis. For the least forgiving it is irredeemable, “a Jewish graveyard.” For many more there is frustration at the seemingly endless patience and sympathy shown for the Palestinians, with no commensurate feelings displayed toward Israelis at the receiving end of Hamas’ rockets."

My response: Firstly, I'm no friend of Hamas or the Palestinians. I see them (like most radical muslims) as a threat to western civilization but as I have pointed out in another blog article of mine, I don't really care about the whole Palestinian-Israeli conflict, as long as it doesn't directly affect my people (which it doesn't) then I don't see why I should care. The British people have their own problems, we don't have the energy to take on the rest of the world's problems.

However, what would Paul Gross like us to do? He complains that we're (a part from Holland) not giving enough support to Israel, sorry for pointing out the obvious but it looks like Israel can deal with it well enough themselves (at least militarily that is). Israel does not need any help dealing with Hamas or Hezbollah. Israel's military is probably equivalent to that of Japan or India and those countries don't beg for help when they get attacked, to me it sounds like someone needs to grow up and stop hiding behind others when things get tough.

Paul Gross continues:  "It is infuriatingly stupid of certain Israeli politicians to condemn genuine friends of Israel like German Chancellor Angela Merkel or British Foreign Secretary William Hague when they criticize Israeli settlement policy."

"But Europe does have an eternal debt to pay the Jewish people, and the currency is this: It must, now and always, adopt a zero-tolerance policy toward anti-Semitism."

"That does not just mean being on guard against the frightening emergence of far-right nationalists like the Jobbik Party in Hungary, or the Golden Dawn in Greece. It should also extend to the new fascism in our midst: The Islamist far-right."

My response: Excuse me, but Europe does not owe Israel anything and I'm greatly offended that this author would shrug democracy aside by demanding European governments should ban the voice of the people (Nationalists). I don't see any European countries saying Israel should ban certain domestic political parties and if they did I'm sure Israel would protest greatly at that clear intrusion of their democratic system and rightly so.

The language of Paul Gross is dangerous, mainly because he seems to have his own definition of what is anti-semitic and what is not, next he could say Front National of France is dangerous and needs to be banned or he could say the same about the English Defence League.

The reason this causes me concern is that this view espoused by Paul Gross is actually held by many Jewish groups and political leaders, one needs to look no further than the World Jewish Congress which has actively called for a blanket ban on European Nationalist movements such as the Golden Dawn in Greece. This is nothing short of an outright attack on the democratic system of Europe and is equivalent to those Islamic pressure groups calling for a ban on 'Islamophobic groups' such as the English Defence League (EDL).

My final say on this issue is that respectable Jews out there, whether in Israel or somewhere else should respect our democratic right to elect whoever we wish, they should understand that we are not owned by anyone, we not slaves to anybody and that we will fight back against such attacks against us.

Cheers.

LINKS:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Europes-historic-responsibility-Proscribe-terror-316072
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/167290
http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2013/05/07/world-jewish-leaders-urge-crackdown-on-far-right-in-europe/

Transgender Prom Queen Madness

Isn't she a stunner?

Do you ever feel like you're becoming extremely isolated being a sane person in an increasingly insane world? Well this recent story might finally convince you that we're all doomed and that the only way out is to hope a massive asteroid wipes out what is left of this mess we call humanity so maybe we can start all over again or perhaps we could give the Dolphins a chance at running this world.

This blog post is about the new prom queen at Middleboro High School, Cody Tubman (pictured above). He/she/it was voted prom queen by his/her fellow progressive students, apparently they don't care Cody is transgender and they think he/she/it looks beautiful.

Cody was very happy after being elected prom queen and said to local news; "I was all smiles, Cody says laughing. We were standing there and they announced I was prom queen. So I was like ‘oh yay, so exciting,’ But it was kind of surprising."

Cody says he/she/it was born a boy but started dressing as a girl when he/she/it was a freshman in high school. He/she/it says he/she/it feels more confident and comfortable in her (persona) body.

Yeah, Let's just ignore science and pretend that it doesn't matter that he has no female organs, acknowledging that fact that would be bigoted and old fashioned. I mean, it's not like Cody is mentally ill and should be getting treated for actually believing he is a real girl when in fact he is a male who was born with a penis and testicles. No, we'll just let him keep playing pretend because that is clearly the progressive thing to do isn't it?

Cody’s family is proud of his/her accomplishment, especially Cody’s little sister Caylin (presumably a girl but could also be Cody's little brother too)  who said; "I’ve learned not to care what people think of me. Just because they want to judge me doesn’t mean that they can bring me down, the 7th grader said. (Wait...what? I'm confused, is Caylin also transgender? Why is she referring to herself when this is about Cody). Please don't tell me his little sister Caylin also has gender issues, I mean what the fuck are these parents doing to their own children, and why isn't anyone helping them? Dear god.

Anyway, this isn't actually the first case of a transgender student being elected prom queen or prom king, I've actually read a few cases of this happening in the last year or so. This trend seemingly started to begin as early as the 1990s but now you hear about it more often than ever before.

Call me old fashioned, call me a bigot who should check his male privilege, I don't give a shit. I would never ever take part in a circus show like this if I was at that school and if I had the chance to meet the parents of Cody and his young sister I would have some very unsavoury words for them to put it politely. And I bet some real stunner missed out on becoming prom queen this year at Middleboro High School, some blonde haired-blue eyed sweetheart who all the normal straight guys like, but due to political correctness and the breakdown of morality they ended up with Cody Tubman (pardon the pun) as prom queen. Just ridiculous really.

This is what a FEMALE looks like.

Cheers.

LINKS:

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2013/05/31/transgender-teen-voted-prom-queen-at-middleboro-high/
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/education/cody-tubman-transgender-teen-voted-prom-queen-video
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/03/Transgender-wins-prom-queen